The Case for Reading Braille

| No Comments


Many people, including some advocates for the disabled, feel that vision-impaired persons, especially adults, don't need to learn how to read braille.  The prevailing attitude is that legally blind people don't have to read braille books because they can simply listen to recorded versions of them on audiocassette and compact disc. 

 William M. Raeder, former president of the National Braille Press, disagrees: 

From the mid-'60s to the present, the percentage of school-aged blind children in this country who use braille as their primary reading medium has dropped from 50 percent to 12 percent, and more than a generation of blind children has been largely allowed to grow up illiterate under the damaging notion that tape recordings and talking computers are sufficient for them.

You can read the rest of his essay here.  Strong stuff.  -Ed



Leave a comment

We want to hear from you. Feel free to post comments, questions and other thoughts but please remember:

  • Stay on topic.
  • Be polite and respectful
  • Don’t post copyrighted materials
  • Please don’t post content that installs viruses, worms, etc.
  • No spam please.

Please see our Comment Guidelines page for more information.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Ed published on December 30, 2008 3:13 PM.

Guest Review: Bartok Concero for Orchestra DVD was the previous entry in this blog.

Norman Spinrad's Home Page is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.